Compare

Your tools connected to ChatGPT or Claude,
or one shared project history.

ChatGPT and Claude can both search your Slack, Drive and GitHub through connectors. That's useful for one person's questions. Claro Historia does a different job: it keeps one history of each project that the whole team asks from.

Start your 30-day trial →

Full access for 30 days. No credit card needed.

The Short Version

Three differences that matter.

Set up once, not once per person
With connectors, each person signs in to each of their own accounts, and an admin usually has to allow the connector first. In Claro Historia an admin connects a tool once for the workspace, and each project links the exact channels, repositories and folders it uses. A new teammate gets the same answers on day one, with no setup.
Kept up between questions
An assistant looks things up when you ask, and forgets the project when the chat ends. Claro Historia reads a project's sources on a schedule and records its milestones, decisions, risks and people changes as they happen, so the history is already there when someone asks.
Scoped to the project
A connector searches everything your accounts can reach. A Claro Historia project reads only what's linked to it, so a question about the payments migration is answered from the payments migration, not from every channel that mentions payments.

Side by Side

At a glance.

ChatGPT or Claude with connectorsClaro Historia
Who sets it upEach person connects their own accounts. On ChatGPT Business and Claude Team or Enterprise, an admin allows connectors first.An admin connects each tool once for the workspace. Drive and OneDrive are connected by each person, since those are personal accounts.
Who gets the answersThe person who connected the accounts, in their own chats. Claude's connectors work only in private projects.Everyone in the workspace, from the same sources, in a shared project.
What an answer draws onAnything the person's connected accounts can reach.Only the sources linked to the project.
Between questionsSome connected data is synced ahead of time, but nothing records the project's history. Each answer is put together when you ask.Sources are synced on a schedule. Milestones, decisions, risks and people changes are recorded as they happen.
Across projectsNot a feature.Dashboards group projects to show progress, overdue work and open risks.
Sources behind an answerUsually cited.Cited, with a link to each document, ticket or thread.
Writing, coding, everything elseYes. These are general assistants.No. Claro Historia answers questions about your projects.
How to startConnectors that read company tools are mostly on paid business plans.A 30-day trial with full access and no credit card, then a free plan.

Choosing

Which one fits.

ChatGPT or Claude is the better fit when
  • The questions are your own, across your own email, files and messages.
  • You need writing, analysis or code alongside the answer.
  • Each answer must stay within what that one person is allowed to see in each tool. A Claro Historia project's linked sources are shared with everyone in the workspace.
Claro Historia is the better fit when
  • A whole team needs the same answers about the same projects, including people who joined last week.
  • You want the decisions and risks of a project recorded over time, not just found when someone thinks to ask.
  • You'd rather not have everyone wire up their own connectors and pick the right channels and folders themselves.

Many teams will use both: an assistant for their own work, and Claro Historia for the shared history of each project.

What this page says about other products comes from their public pages and documentation, checked in October 2026. Products change. If something here is out of date, email support@clarohistoria.com and we'll fix it.

Try it on your own projects.

Connect the tools your team already uses, link a project's channels, repositories and folders, and start asking. Full access for 30 days, then it continues on the free plan.

Start your 30-day trial →

No credit card needed.

Other comparisons: Glean · Built-in search · Notion AI and Confluence